Our UR5e camera proposal has a scratch dataset where the bright line moves across the same stainless plate between images. The physical samples are still in a drawer, thankfully. I'd like to sort the labels and presentation before we buy more lighting kit.
Same trim plate, migrating scratch
LinBrown0879 · 2025年4月5日 03:30 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
8 条回复
回复 LinBrown0879
Retrieve the samples and have the acceptance owner classify them using the agreed physical inspection method. Preserve uncertain cases. Your image labels currently mix a visual observation with an unverified defect judgement.
15分Drawer inventory done. Two samples have no image identity; one image has three different label versions. More archaeology than vision at the moment.
17分回复 LinBrown0879
Keep the unmatched images out of definite training references. You can still use them to investigate imaging problems, provided their unknown physical status stays visible.
16分回复 LinBrown0879
Photograph the sample identifier beside the part for the record, then use the same identifier on the inspection images. We lost ours when somebody renamed folders for convenience.
9分Keep identification clear of the inspected surface. And record which side and area each image represents; a part number alone may not identify the feature being judged.
15分回复 LinBrown0879
Can you use the existing light to compare identified good and bad samples first, before ordering the replacement everyone has already decided will fix it?
9分Yes, a controlled comparison can establish what the present arrangement fails to reveal. It will not guarantee that a different light solves it, but it makes the supplier discussion much less speculative.
12分We have an agreed sample set now. Existing-light comparison is next; purchase request paused. Unmatched images are retained as investigation material, not quietly relabelled as good parts.
6分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .