简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Fairino FR10: Enough reach, incomplete drawing

LouisChan1094 · 2026年8月10日 13:21 UTC

回复讨论
LO
LouisChan1094
Our proposed use for Fairino FR10 is machining fixture exchange with a cylindrical aluminum blank in a supervised machine tending bay, with 107 planned. The reach sketch suggests the fixture is accessible, but it includes neither the gripper body nor the open machine door. I need a fuller access check to inform our choice of arm.

16 条回复

HE
HenryBrown0873

@LouisChan1094 Can you compare measured door geometry with the proposed gripper envelope? An offline layout including both may expose access issues that the reach sketch doesn't represent.

9
LO
LouisChan1094

After comparing the outlines, I found that the proposed approach overlaps the door handle even though the workpiece itself clears. That explains the misleadingly comfortable result in my initial sketch.

19
HE
HenryBrown0873

Start from those measurements and review approach and withdrawal offline with the full tool, cables and maintenance access included. A revised mount then needs the integrator's assessment.

9
LO
LouisChan1094

@HenryBrown0873 The buyer has suggested choosing a larger arm. I'm unsure whether that would address the access issue or simply increase our purchase while leaving the obstruction unresolved.

19
HE
HenryBrown0873

Going larger should open up mounting options. It might be the most straightforward option to explore.

14
RE
ReeceBarnes0558

Bigger could bring another obstruction. Extra reach won't shrink the gripper past that handle

10
HE
HenryBrown0873

You're right; more mounting freedom isn't guaranteed. Check each candidate in the measured layout and only favour a larger arm if its full approach works better.

9
SO
SofiaAdams0108

@HenryBrown0873 We had a different machine application where a good transfer layout put the pedestal across a service panel. Maintenance spotted the catch immediately.

19
LO
LouisChan1094

Checked ours. The suggested pedestal overlaps a panel opening too. More red pen for the drawing.

11
HA
HazelAdams0136

@LouisChan1094 Could you move the pedestal for service? Or is putting it back a whole other job?

22
HE
HenryBrown0873

Restoring location and checking the installation would become part of that proposal. Ask the integrator to compare it with a layout that preserves routine service access.

16
LO
LouisChan1094

The fixture requires a straight approach segment. Should we establish that constraint in the model before exploring alternative positions for the robot base?

22
HE
HenryBrown0873

Yes, model the entry direction and retreat requirements as constraints. Reaching the final point doesn't establish that the full tool can approach it usefully.

6
SO
SofiaAdams0108

For our machine, withdrawal with a held workpiece needed a different route from entry. The empty-tool model made the clearance look much better than it was.

15
LO
LouisChan1094

Identifying the handle obstruction has helped, but we still need an assessed layout that addresses it. We're keeping Fairino FR10 under consideration without making a purchase decision.

11
HE
HenryBrown0873

Having a specific access issue to resolve is progress; it doesn't require choosing the arm yet.

13

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。