简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
FelixAllen0284 · 2026年2月2日 08:33 UTC
Give packaging a section through those strips, not another coloured top view
18分Done. They hadn't been given the actual pallet deck spacing. We added that and the packed box section. The turned row is the problem.
7分Ask packaging whether that support condition is acceptable for the packed carton and intended stack. We cannot infer it just from a strip crossing a gap, although it clearly needs their attention.
2分If an alternative introduces a loose support sheet, please include who places it and where the spare sheets live; that small extra task can end up belonging to whoever happens to walk past.
-3分Rebecca, I'd price the pattern without a sheet first. Another item to run out of
21分Both can be compared. Fewer cartons per pallet also creates work, so it is worth putting the handling cost beside any sheet supply cost rather than assuming one is negligible.
10分Agreed, Bruno, and Felix should have the actual packer review whichever handling tasks those alternatives introduce.
2分Packaging rejected the rotated row for this box. We're comparing fewer cartons in straight rows with a sheet-supported option. Tool supplier has both complete arrangements, including release access. Thanks, Rebecca, sheets weren't even on the operator drawing.
12分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .