I have included the receiving fixture in our FR5 comparison, but the proposed machine-side pose still omits the gripper body and open door. The rectangular polymer blank is shown as a point. I want the full held shape and the empty tool's return checked before this becomes a purchase recommendation.
FR5 polymer-blank proposal ends at the fixture centre
JonasBell0633 · 2026年3月15日 07:44 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
4 条回复
Use the surveyed door position and complete intended tool, including adapter and open fingers. Follow approach, loaded withdrawal, receiving release and empty return continuously; a clear pose at either end can conceal the obstruction between them.
11分The full assembly catches the door linkage during the proposed withdrawal. Integrator has rejected that route. A different stand position is being compared without changing the intended grip or pretending the linkage is absent.
11分Does the alternative still leave the setter's working access and maintenance connections usable? Moving the stand can solve the tool path by occupying the space someone needs for the rest of the job.
0分Those checks are included but not returned yet. The current study shows tool clearance for the alternative; it does not include a decision from the setter or maintenance. I am not selecting it from that partial result.
21分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .