Should brush direction be fixed in our UR5e trim-plate references?

AnilCarter0984 · 2026年2月3日 08:37 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

AN
AnilCarter0984
Same accepted stainless plate, rotated in its bench holder, now looks like a reject. Full edge is visible in both images. I suspect the brush direction needs an arrow in our setup sheet. Or a large sign.

17 条回复

OM
OmarChan1100

An arrow sounds useful. Can the loader actually distinguish the two orientations?

17分
AN
AnilCarter0984

Yes, there's an offset hole. My sheet shows the face but manages to crop that hole out of the setup photo. Not my finest page.

4分
AN
AnilAli0201

Did the light move too, or just the plate?

17分
IM
ImranBennett0740

Show the offset hole in the loading view, because an arrow alone still needs a recognisable starting point.

2分
TO
TobyBaker0492

Would a picture of the wrong orientation help? We have people copying a photograph without reading the note underneath it, me included when the shift is busy.

7分
OM
OmarChan1100

Maybe, but don't make the wrong picture the biggest one.

21分
AN
AnilCarter0984

AnilAli: only the plate moved. Imran: I'll put the hole back in view. Toby: a smaller crossed-out reverse view might help, though Omar's right about which picture grabs you first.

18分
AN
AnilAli0201

Then keep that reversed image as a setup example, not another defective part.

5分
TO
TobyBaker0492

Agreed, Omar. I was picturing a tiny inset, not a choose-your-own-loading adventure.

14分
AN
AnilCarter0984

Found the original full setup photo. Hole is perfectly clear. I'd cropped it to make room for a heading. Heading is now shorter.

4分
IM
ImranBennett0740

Use the corrected page with someone who did not help make it, and let them point to the starting orientation before you explain anything.

12分
OM
OmarChan1100

And include an accepted plate with the brush pattern that caused the confusion.

14分
TO
TobyBaker0492

I tried the wrong-view inset on a different instruction sheet once. One reader thought it was the second step. We ended up removing it and keeping one big correct view, with the snag described beside it. So I'd test that bit, not assume my suggestion improves yours.

21分
AN
AnilAli0201

One clear view gets my vote.

23分
AN
AnilCarter0984

Toby, your warning saved us a round. The loader wanted to know why there were two orientations, so we've kept one full correct view. They located the hole without help on the revised page.

11分
IM
ImranBennett0740

That settles the page layout; are the accepted and rejected image examples both using that orientation now?

2分
AN
AnilCarter0984

Yes. Re-shot the bench examples with the hole on the specified side and kept the reversed image outside the reference set. Setup-sheet problem closed. Threshold work for the planned cell can finally start with like-for-like pictures.

6分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .