简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

fr5 exchange drawing leaves the hand and door out

Gavin_Carr · 2026年6月30日 21:55 UTC

回复讨论
GA
Gavin_Carr
Polymer blank reaches the fixture on our sketch. Gripper body and open door absent. What should the access review include?

20 条回复

DA
DanielAllen0304
回复 Gavin_Carr

The complete assembly carrying the blank in its intended grip, against measured machine and parked-door geometry. Include entry, exchange and return, with the setter's separate fixture task. A toolmaker's actual held orientation can differ quite a lot from the easy line in an early sketch.

22
GA
Gavin_Carr

Grip position not defined yet. We have a gripper catalogue outline and the blank drawing.

9
JO
JoelCampbell
回复 Gavin_Carr

Who can define that held position before the model is assembled?

18
CL
ClaraCarter0959
回复 Gavin_Carr

Does the tool supplier's scope include the fingers and adapter, Gavin, or is somebody else expected to design those around the catalogue gripper? That ownership needs to be clear before the combined assembly arrives.

8
NA
NaomiChan1115
回复 Gavin_Carr

The installed opening needs an owner too. I would have the machine lead identify the door condition in the survey rather than let a generic open-door symbol become the reference for the tool supplier.

6
OL
OliverAli0189
回复 Gavin_Carr

And the person changing the fixture needs space. The robot's loading point isn't their whole task.

-8
CH
ChloeBrown0918

Oliver, do you mean space during the automatic cycle, or space for changeover with the cell in its agreed condition? I'd keep those cases distinct rather than imply two activities share the opening.

24
OL
OliverAli0189

Changeover, Chloe. The setter still needs a usable route then; I wasn't suggesting simultaneous work.

11
GA
Gavin_Carr
回复 Gavin_Carr

Joel and Clara, tool supplier owns fingers, adapter and grip. Naomi, machine lead owns the installed survey.

5
JU
Jules_Burke
回复 Gavin_Carr

Will maintenance get the final assembly reference too, not only its picture?

15
AI
AishaAdams0170

Jules, that belongs in the handover. Gavin, I would also retain any different loading and fixture-change conditions on the same revision, so a later reviewer can see which movement each clearance refers to

13
GA
Gavin_Carr

Maintenance will get the identified assembly. Fixture change uses a trolley at the front, separate from automatic exchange.

4
DA
DanielAllen0304
回复 Gavin_Carr

Then include the trolley movement, not merely a rectangle where it parks. The actual turning and fixture-handling route may be the limiting space, even while the final parked position looks clear.

13
JO
JoelCampbell
回复 Gavin_Carr

Has the door been measured yet, Gavin?

20
GA
Gavin_Carr

Survey booked, not done. Tool supplier has acknowledged the grip request but hasn't returned it.

18
CL
ClaraCarter0959
回复 Gavin_Carr

Those are still inputs to obtain, then. Does the integrator own combining them into the route assessment, rather than expecting you to decide whether the separate drawings fit?

18
NA
NaomiChan1115

Clara's ownership point matters; accurate component dimensions can still be assembled using incompatible assumptions about the held blank or door position.

8
GA
Gavin_Carr

Integrator owns the combined assessment now. No alternate base position or grip proposed while those inputs remain missing.

25
CH
ChloeBrown0918
回复 Gavin_Carr

That is a clearer request. It hasn't established clearance yet, which is fine for a discussion about what to ask before choosing the arm.

9
JU
Jules_Burke
回复 Gavin_Carr

Keep purchasing at candidate, then; an acknowledged drawing request isn't the drawing or its assessment.

8

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。