简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

One job label, two possible acknowledgements

LinBrown0879 · 2025年6月19日 12:59 UTC

已关闭
LI
LinBrown0879
Our UR5e inspection app restarts and reuses the job label. PLC and Python clocks disagree. I can see a timeout and an acknowledgement, but can't tell which attempt the acknowledgement belongs to.

4 条回复

JA
JasperChan1073

Keep each source in its own recorded order first. Mark the restart and label reuse. Do you have any shared event with a known relationship that could bound the clock difference, rather than forcing the timestamps into one apparently exact sequence?

19
LI
LinBrown0879

No reliable clock link found. Python order is clear across its saved files, but the PLC acknowledgement has only the reused job label. Leaving it unassigned.

16
JA
JasperChan1073

That is the honest limit of this reconstruction. For the interface repair, give attempts identities that survive this distinction (including a new run after restart), then test delayed acknowledgements against them.

25
SO
SofiaBaker0456

Did you find any independent evidence for the old acknowledgement, or does it remain unassigned?

-6

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .