Housing flat in the tray, crooked after finger contact

RickShift · 2025年10月16日 09:23 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

RI
RickShift
Our FR5 housing sits flat before pickup. It turns at first finger contact. Pickup edits keep accumulating.

18 条回复

HA
HassanChan1052
回复 RickShift

Which finger touches first, and is that from a clear view or somebody's impression across the bench?

10分
RI
RickShift

Left finger, clear side clip. I checked the before-contact seat separately after a similar question here

16分
LI
LinAbbott0009
回复 RickShift

Good, that narrows the story. Has maintenance compared the actual contact profiles and mounting, rather than assuming a matched pair because both fingers came out of one bag?

12分
BE
BethArcher0411
回复 RickShift

Were the fingers changed before the first point edit, Rick? I'd like the changes in order before anybody rolls the program back to something called original

19分
OM
OmarBrown0926
回复 RickShift

Our measurements got clearer when we kept one identified part through the first comparison. Keep Rick's filmed housing available, then widen the sample once maintenance knows what it is comparing.

10分
RI
RickShift

Finger replacement preceded the edits. Same filmed housing retained. Maintenance hasn't identified the fitted pair yet

-9分
HA
HassanChan1052
回复 RickShift

Does the issue record name a left and right part, or just one kit reference?

24分
LI
LinAbbott0009

Hassan, either can be legitimate. The question is whether the physical parts match the intended assembly. A very detailed label can still accompany the wrong thing.

21分
HA
HassanChan1052

I know. I'm trying to find what maintenance can compare it with, not let the label win the argument.

15分
BE
BethArcher0411
回复 RickShift

While they're looking, keep the edit reasons too if anyone remembers them. Left a bit isn't much of a handover for whoever reviews the restored setup

16分
RI
RickShift

Kit reference only. Toolmaker has the photos and markings. Point versions saved, reasons patchy

-2分
OM
OmarBrown0926
回复 RickShift

Then leave the missing reasons missing. I've seen a tidy retrospective explanation become more trusted than the awkward observation that started the work.

9分
LI
LinAbbott0009

Exactly. You don't need everyone to remember a perfect history before inspecting a visibly wrong grip. Just don't pretend the inspection answers every historical question either

21分
RI
RickShift
回复 RickShift

Toolmaker identified one different-profile replacement finger. Correct pair requested. No restored setup tested yet

12分
BE
BethArcher0411
回复 RickShift

Who is checking the spare kit on the shelf? Would be annoying to repeat this at the next wear change

13分
HA
HassanChan1052
回复 RickShift

And who owns the physical-assembly check when the correct pair arrives? Don't leave that as a parcel arriving followed by somebody trying the old offsets.

13分
LI
LinAbbott0009

Beth, that spare-kit question is worth asking now. Quarantining a suspect spare while it's identified is a lot cheaper than commissioning the same fault twice

9分
OM
OmarBrown0926
回复 RickShift

Rick, when it is ready, compare the retained housing and other relevant samples under the reviewed setup. Please post what changes, not only that new fingers arrived.

6分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .