Two aluminium-housing tooling quotes justify the FR5 from part mass alone, although the proposed assembly has extended fingers, an adapter and hose fittings; what complete load information should I require before treating either quote as technically comparable?
Why do both FR5 load arguments pretend the tooling is weightless?
LouisAbbott0050 · 2026年6月13日 17:08 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文