Why do both FR5 load arguments pretend the tooling is weightless?

LouisAbbott0050 · 13 Jun 2026, 17:08 UTC

Reply to discussion
LO
LouisAbbott0050
Two aluminium-housing tooling quotes justify the FR5 from part mass alone, although the proposed assembly has extended fingers, an adapter and hose fittings; what complete load information should I require before treating either quote as technically comparable?

0 replies

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.