Two aluminium-housing tooling quotes justify the FR5 from part mass alone, although the proposed assembly has extended fingers, an adapter and hose fittings; what complete load information should I require before treating either quote as technically comparable?
Why do both FR5 load arguments pretend the tooling is weightless?
LouisAbbott0050 · 13 Jun 2026, 17:08 UTC
0 replies
Add to the discussion
Welcome to Application Robot
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.