Define the held blank with the complete gripper, fingers, adapter and connections, then compare its route against surveyed machine and door geometry rather than the fixture point alone.
简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。
fr5 blank-loading choice needs the hand inside the machine drawing
AdaCarter0999 · 2026年7月4日 17:22 UTC
20 条回复
Who supplies the actual parked-door position? Maximum opening is not necessarily the operating position.
17分And the tool connection's position matters. Listing a fitting does not define its occupied space.
14分Machine service owns the door survey. Tool supplier is defining grip depth and the complete connection arrangement.
16分Is the base position already constrained by something, or is it just the sketch's first suggestion?
11分Keep human fixture-change and service tasks in the survey too, so any candidate base is compared with the same real access requirements.
6分Base is provisional. Setter has marked fixture removal space; there is no agreed alternative location yet.
19分Will the combined model include empty withdrawal with the fingers open, as well as loaded entry?
3分Yes. Complete states and connecting movements are in scope. Supplier drawings are back; integrator is joining them.
21分Use a common reference when joining them. Two valid component drawings need not share an origin.
0分That caught an error in the first combined view: the adapter origin was mistaken for the wrist mounting face. Integrator is correcting it before reporting any interference.
15分Did that correction change the candidate, or only repair how it was represented?
6分Useful distinction. A corrected assembly model doesn't mean the offered hardware changed; keep the actual revision identifiable.
6分Same offered hardware. Corrected model clears entry, release and withdrawal at the original candidate base.
11分Has the clearance review allowed for the actual door position range and installed variation?
23分And don't convert room in the model into an arm-loading result. Those are separate assessments.
23分Door range and installation allowances are included in the revised review. Loading assessment is still outstanding.
17分Does the setter still have the marked removal space at that base?
7分Yes, setter and service accepted their access. The complete-load assessment is now acceptable too. We have shortlisted this configuration, with physical commissioning and the final cost comparison still to do.
14分Keep the corrected reference alignment and assessed assembly with the shortlist. They explain why the apparent interference disappeared without pretending the original incomplete sketch had already proved the choice.
6分