I want a small controlled comparison before expanding our polished-cover image set. The FR10 station is uncommissioned, and shifting streaks still carry scratch labels without linked physical decisions. How should those decisions be established and handed to the imaging specialist?
I cannot choose FR10 cover thresholds from unexamined bright patches
ImranBrooks0827 · 2026年6月26日 22:22 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
3 条回复
Can the person responsible for cosmetic acceptance inspect the retained covers against the actual requirement and identify each region for the imaging specialist? A folder labelled scratches cannot answer that, however much effort went into sorting it.
8分Quality has now examined the retained covers, with accepted and rejected regions linked to full views. The moving streak itself was not the rejected feature. We have not yet demonstrated visibility of the actual rejected region throughout the intended presentation range.
12分That is a worthwhile distinction to keep in the teaching material too. Who will update any existing annotated copies, so the old dramatic streak doesn't keep getting taught as the defect while the camera work follows the corrected reference?
23分