Which geometry is missing from this welding-cell proposal?

LucaBennett0700 · 2026年5月27日 11:03 UTC

回复讨论

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

LU
LucaBennett0700
We're planning planning robotic welding of bracket assemblies with Fairino FR10 on a steel angle-bracket assembly in a welded-assemblies production workshop. The reach sketch includes every seam, but the torch is just a line. The actual torch body and fixture clamps make inside-corner access look doubtful. This is offline only, with no live welding trials. What should I ask our integrator to include?

10 条回复

ME
MeiAllen0342

Start with complete torch and clamp geometry, paired with the welding engineer's required joint access. Are those available for the integrator's offline comparison?

4分
LU
LucaBennett0700

@MeiAllen0342 I've the torch assembly drawing and clamp model. The layout pack doesn't state any required torch orientations. It really is just reach so far.

5分
ME
MeiAllen0342

Have the welding engineer specify the required orientations, then include the actual torch assembly in the offline model. That creates a basis for assessing clearance.

9分
RA
RaviBennett0737

@MeiAllen0342 Assessable at a pose, perhaps. You haven't mentioned getting into or out of it, or the cable envelope. Those can spoil a convincing screenshot

15分
ME
MeiAllen0342

@RaviBennett0737 You're right; I described too narrow a check. Include approach, withdrawal, mounting hardware and the cable-routing envelope in the offline access review.

14分
LU
LucaBennett0700

Who supplies the cable envelope? The torch drawing shows connectors but doesn't define the routed shape.

14分
ME
MeiAllen0342

The integrator should coordinate the routing information with the equipment supplier and identify the assumptions used. Until defined, the cable path remains a limitation of the model.

13分
CA
CalebBarnes0580

On my separate welding layout, the tool model was complete but the extraction hardware wasn't there. We had a beautiful answer to an incomplete question.

1分
LU
LucaBennett0700

@CalebBarnes0580 I've got a concrete request for the integrator: real tool geometry assessed against the welding requirements offline. That settles what I needed from this discussion; accepting the access concept still depends on the assessment.

14分
ME
MeiAllen0342

You've settled what to ask the integrator, with concept acceptance still dependent on assessing the actual tool against the welding requirements.

19分

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 和 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。