The proposed fingers need gaps beneath our packed box, but packaging marks those same strips as load-bearing; who should combine the two requirements before I accept the layer?
Which carton supports must our FR10 finger drawing leave intact?
MinaBrown0946 · 2026年2月10日 23:29 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
6 条回复
Have the integrator combine packaging's bearing-area requirement with the complete tool release and withdrawal. Separate approvals for incompatible sections won't give you a usable layer.
7分Integrator has it; packaging suggests a support sheet, though its placement is absent from the quoted sequence.
19分Then the sheet adds work that needs an owner. Ask who supplies it, places it and replenishes the stack. Don't let a cheap material become an unpriced second job.
10分回复 BenAdams0109
Our maintenance cover inherited a sheet feeder without any spare material identified. The hardware was available and the station still waited. Include the actual sheet specification and supply arrangement if that option proceeds.
11分And compare an arrangement without the sheet if one is possible. Neither option deserves to win until its support, release and extra handling are explained.
6分Aisha, exactly. Material supply and fault cover belong in the cost, not in a hopeful note saying operator assistance.
22分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .