简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
LucyArcher0393 · 2026年7月3日 22:21 UTC
Packaging should define the filled case's bearing requirements against the actual lower layer and pallet deck.
4分Ask why the alternation was chosen as well. Interlocking appearance is not an acceptance result; the packaging team needs to assess the stack and its intended handling, not just a single supported carton.
9分It was chosen for apparent stack stability. Packaging has now rejected two rotated positions: required ends cross gaps.
16分Then those positions fail this support review. A clear gripper route would not rescue them; a different layer still needs both assessments.
-3分Can dispatch accept a different pallet quantity, if the joint review needs it?
10分Who is drawing the alternative? Tooling and packaging need one owner joining their changes, not two disconnected approvals
6分Dispatch allows a lower quantity. The integrator owns a straight-row candidate, with packaging checking stack stability as well as bearing.
8分Keep its transport and handling assumptions visible. Straight rows are not automatically unsuitable, but neither does adequate vertical bearing establish the complete stack's suitability for dispatch.
12分The candidate has passed packaging's defined load assessment and the complete tooling model, including partial layers. Physical handling checks remain.
12分Which pallet was used in that assessment? The approved load should not quietly migrate to a different deck when stores runs short.
6分Our specified dispatch pallet. Its identity is on the pattern. Physical placement, release and the defined dispatch handling checks have now passed; packaging and integration signed that arrangement, with the allowed partial loads stated.
19分Has dispatch updated its pallet allocation for the lower quantity? The approved pattern needs that practical handover too.
12分