简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Component-case supports still missing from my FR10 layer decision

TobyAdams0144 · 2026年8月1日 02:27 UTC

回复讨论
TO
TobyAdams0144
I've told other reviewers to put packaging constraints and the tool sequence on one drawing. Now my FR10 component-case pattern needs that treatment: the alternating layout rotates cases over gaps against their preferred support direction. What evidence belongs in that joint review before I accept it?

1 条回复

TH
TheoAbbott0062

Have packaging define the required bearing regions for the actual packed cases, then show those regions against the underlying layers and the tool's approach, opening and withdrawal. Include the sequence with neighbouring cases already placed, not only the completed layer. The reviewers should be able to identify which positions meet both sets of requirements and which need further assessment; a shared drawing helps them work together, but does not itself establish acceptable support.

5

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。