I've told other reviewers to put packaging constraints and the tool sequence on one drawing. Now my FR10 component-case pattern needs that treatment: the alternating layout rotates cases over gaps against their preferred support direction. What evidence belongs in that joint review before I accept it?
Have packaging define the required bearing regions for the actual packed cases, then show those regions against the underlying layers and the tool's approach, opening and withdrawal. Include the sequence with neighbouring cases already placed, not only the completed layer. The reviewers should be able to identify which positions meet both sets of requirements and which need further assessment; a shared drawing helps them work together, but does not itself establish acceptable support.