Which FR5 SDK does the working laptop really load?

JackCarter1037 · 2026年2月12日 15:34 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

JA
JackCarter1037
Our rebuilt laptop rejects an argument in the same read-only identity script the old laptop runs, and I have several SDK folders with no useful notes; what should I record from the working launcher before the maintainer changes anything?

14 条回复

JO
JonasArcher0372

Record the interpreter and actual imported module path from the normal launcher, plus the method signature. Do the same on the rebuilt laptop. Folder names are not a dependency record.

11分
JA
JackCarter1037

The two launchers use different interpreters and imported copies, though both folders are labelled current; I have those paths and signatures saved now.

0分
PA
PavelAli0179

Have the maintainer select the supported library and call for the controller version, then make the launcher use that defined environment. Preserve the working set while comparing; copying a familiar folder can conceal the original difference.

6分
TH
ThomasAli0190

Did the error report come from the normal user account, Jack, or from someone testing the script in a separate terminal?

-4分
JA
JackCarter1037

Normal account and shortcut on both; maintainer found the rebuilt shortcut's interpreter imports an older shared SDK whose method has the different argument list.

7分
JO
JonasArcher0372

Then the launcher is part of the fix. Keep the interpreter, dependency and call together in the setup record, not three separate notes that can drift apart.

10分
AN
AnnaBell0677

Does any other application still need that shared copy?

1分
PA
PavelAli0179

Anna's question is why a dedicated environment is useful here. Correct this script's dependency selection without replacing a shared library another application may still require.

20分
JA
JackCarter1037

The shared copy serves an older teaching example, so it stays; our identity check now has a dedicated supported environment and a revised launcher, with the documented call unchanged.

21分
TH
ThomasAli0190

Has the normal shortcut completed the actual identity read, including after closing and reopening?

0分
JA
JackCarter1037

Yes, correct controller identity from the normal shortcut and after reopen, with the expected imported path; the maintainer also checked it under the covering shift's account.

8分
JO
JonasArcher0372

Remove the obsolete shortcut from the shared launch location. Otherwise the next person can select the old environment perfectly correctly.

6分
JA
JackCarter1037

Obsolete shortcut removed from that location, working replacement checked by the covering operator; thanks, Anna, we fixed this job without breaking the teaching example beside it.

14分
AN
AnnaBell0677

Who owns updating that environment when the script next changes?

18分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .