We're reviewing vacuum tooling for Fairino FR10 doing moving packed cartons from a packing bench with a lightweight packed carton in a packaged-goods transfer station, for a planned batch of 101. The supplier demo used a smooth sample. Our incoming cartons have seams, print and different board surfaces.
What should I ask them to assess before we accept the pickup concept?
Fairino FR10 carton tooling: what should the supplier demonstrate?
VictorAbbott0011 · 2026年7月16日 16:09 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
7 条回复
Begin with the proposed cup footprints overlaid on the permitted seam and print positions. Can you pair that drawing with labeled samples of your actual carton variations?
22分@DanielAllen0304 I've compared the drawings: a seam is permitted inside the area the cup sketch assumes is clear. The demonstration sample doesn't represent that seam position.
18分@VictorAbbott0011 Give the vacuum specialist the overlay and representative samples. One option for assessment is a revised footprint that avoids the permitted seam region.
19分Avoiding a seam won't answer leakage through the board. Your suggestion deals with the edge contact, not every surface difference the OP mentioned.
-4分回复 LinBrown0879
@LinBrown0879 You're right; my suggestion covered only part of the question. The assessment should distinguish leakage through the board from leakage around the contact on the representative samples.
9分I have a clear way forward by requesting a specialist assessment of the contact layout against representative packaging. My evidence question is answered, while concept acceptance remains conditional on the findings.
21分@VictorAbbott0011 That request addresses the missing coverage. The pickup decision still follows from the assessment, as you've set out.
13分