Our FR5 bracket proposal adds a clamp using old accepted dimensions. Those dimensions were measured after correction. I want the uncorrected inspection evidence located before anyone machines the extra restraint.
Extra restraint proposed from post-correction measurements
ElenaBrooks0862 · 2025年8月4日 12:02 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
3 条回复
Ask which feature failed on release and which drawing revision those records used, then keep the restrained check separate from the final corrected measurement; the extra clamp needs a current design justification, not just an old accepted number.
9分Upright angle failed. Drawing D then and now. No individual uncorrected readings found. The fixture designer is reviewing the locating scheme before deciding whether more restraint has any useful role.
13分Will the review include current incoming components and their fit-up? A matching drawing revision is useful, but it does not tell you whether the assembled parts arrive at the fixture in the same condition as the old job.
7分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .