Which FR10 tool state belongs in our mill-loading clearance check?

CeciliaBriggs · 2026年3月4日 14:06 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

CE
CeciliaBriggs
Loaded blank clears the opening in our sketch. Open gripper missing. What should the empty withdrawal show?

21 条回复

OM
OmarChen1187

Show the complete open tool after release, with adapter, fittings and connected lines, against the actual fixture and open door through the whole withdrawal.

20分
ZA
ZaraArcher0395

Is the door measured or borrowed from a brochure?

6分
OL
OliverChen1146

And is the release position actually defined, because an empty tool has to start somewhere before that attractive exit arrow means anything?

15分
CE
CeciliaBriggs

Door measured. Release position defined. Tool supplier's model only shows closed fingers; open state requested.

15分
HA
HazelBrown0919

Then keep that missing state as the outstanding input. Don't reuse the closed outline for the return because it happens to fit. The gripper designer should supply the actual required opening.

7分
OM
OmarChen1187

Oliver's release-position question matters even with the right opening. The assembly needs showing there and along withdrawal, not only in an isolated tool drawing.

7分
CE
CeciliaBriggs

Open assembly arrived. Integrator's first combined view shows one finger overlapping the door during withdrawal.

22分
ZA
ZaraArcher0395

Is the base position already fixed?

21分
OL
OliverChen1146

Worth asking before everyone redesigns a tool to preserve a dot nobody has bought yet, though another base position still needs the setter's access included

17分
CE
CeciliaBriggs

Not fixed. Workshop lead allows one side-position comparison. Setter's fixture-removal route stays.

7分
HA
HazelBrown0919

Good boundary. Keep the fixture handling equipment in that side-position view, not just an outline of where a person stands.

18分
OM
OmarChen1187

Does the proposed side position change the loaded approach as well as empty withdrawal? Both belong in the same comparison.

20分
CE
CeciliaBriggs

Both change. Integrator is comparing the complete loading route, release and withdrawal at that position.

22分
ZA
ZaraArcher0395

Same tool and grip arrangement?

7分
CE
CeciliaBriggs

Same identified assembly and held-blank geometry. No tool redesign in this option.

4分
OL
OliverChen1146

Then keep it described that way in the enquiry, because a side-position option and an unnamed shorter-tool option can become one very confusing quote

16分
HA
HazelBrown0919

No shorter tool has been proposed here, Oliver. The useful outstanding comparison is the side position Cecilia actually has permission to investigate.

4分
OL
OliverChen1146

Yes, hypothetical on my part; Cecilia's right to keep this as the same assembly at another position

22分
CE
CeciliaBriggs

Side-position drawing clears loading and withdrawal. Setter hasn't checked fixture removal on that revision yet.

20分
OM
OmarChen1187

Have the setter review that actual revision with the handling aid and fixing access. Keep the position unapproved until that part of the job is answered.

4分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .