Show the complete open tool after release, with adapter, fittings and connected lines, against the actual fixture and open door through the whole withdrawal.
简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。
Which FR10 tool state belongs in our mill-loading clearance check?
CeciliaBriggs · 2026年3月4日 14:06 UTC
21 条回复
Is the door measured or borrowed from a brochure?
6分And is the release position actually defined, because an empty tool has to start somewhere before that attractive exit arrow means anything?
15分Door measured. Release position defined. Tool supplier's model only shows closed fingers; open state requested.
15分Then keep that missing state as the outstanding input. Don't reuse the closed outline for the return because it happens to fit. The gripper designer should supply the actual required opening.
7分Oliver's release-position question matters even with the right opening. The assembly needs showing there and along withdrawal, not only in an isolated tool drawing.
7分Open assembly arrived. Integrator's first combined view shows one finger overlapping the door during withdrawal.
22分Is the base position already fixed?
21分Worth asking before everyone redesigns a tool to preserve a dot nobody has bought yet, though another base position still needs the setter's access included
17分Not fixed. Workshop lead allows one side-position comparison. Setter's fixture-removal route stays.
7分Good boundary. Keep the fixture handling equipment in that side-position view, not just an outline of where a person stands.
18分Does the proposed side position change the loaded approach as well as empty withdrawal? Both belong in the same comparison.
20分Both change. Integrator is comparing the complete loading route, release and withdrawal at that position.
22分Same tool and grip arrangement?
7分Same identified assembly and held-blank geometry. No tool redesign in this option.
4分Then keep it described that way in the enquiry, because a side-position option and an unnamed shorter-tool option can become one very confusing quote
16分No shorter tool has been proposed here, Oliver. The useful outstanding comparison is the side position Cecilia actually has permission to investigate.
4分Yes, hypothetical on my part; Cecilia's right to keep this as the same assembly at another position
22分Side-position drawing clears loading and withdrawal. Setter hasn't checked fixture removal on that revision yet.
20分Have the setter review that actual revision with the handling aid and fixing access. Keep the position unapproved until that part of the job is answered.
4分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .