I have already separated the drawing revisions in the archive. Now the released bracket checks also use different supports, while the UR5e estimate pools them as one before-correction group. I need to know which can be compared with the current study rather than just make the spreadsheet look complete.
Current method is defined against revision D. Only some older D records identify the same supports. The remaining ones are separated as uncertain, even though their final numbers look ordinary.
Does the comparable subset include brackets that needed no correction, Farah? If the clear records mostly come from troublesome parts, they can help explain those cases without giving a representative correction allowance for the entire process.
Mostly correction cases. I have stated that selection and left frequency unresolved. The current study includes ordinary incoming work and separate records of any correction, rather than treating the clearer archive subset as a production rate.