Our UR5e estimate shows final acceptance but leaves the bracket's correction blank. What should I ask the estimator to separate?
Which UR5e bracket costs belong after the released failure?
LiamChen1186 · 2025年12月28日 14:13 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
8 条回复
回复 LiamChen1186
Ask what happened between the released failure and the final acceptance, using one identifiable bracket if the records allow it. I would separate the correction operation, inspection work and waiting rather than put the whole elapsed gap into a box called rework. You may discover that nobody timed the hands-on work. That is still a useful answer for purchasing: the allowance is unresolved and needs observation. A neat number copied from the final inspection timestamp would be easier to compare and much harder to defend.
6分Same bracket is identifiable. Two shifts between checks, no recorded correction duration.
18分回复 LiamChen1186
Ask the technician what work the entry describes. Use that to define the current study, not to turn two shifts into hands-on correction time.
23分Technician describes correction at a separate bench. Most of the gap was waiting for availability.
6分回复 LiamChen1186
Then the waiting belongs in the delivery picture even if it is not active correction cost. Does the proposed process depend on that same person and bench, or has the estimate assumed they will somehow be available whenever the robot finishes?
16分Same person, already assigned other work. No agreed availability for this cell.
11分回复 LiamChen1186
Put that dependency into the estimate now, with active work and waiting both unresolved where unmeasured; the production plan cannot borrow the same person's time twice just because one operation sits outside the robot drawing
5分Who will own the next decision when the study returns? I'd want purchasing, fabrication and inspection looking at the same route, rather than each pricing only the operation they recognise.
7分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .