简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

One item, several inspections, an inflated total (sample verification)

BrunoArcher0365 · 2026年7月15日 20:33 UTC

回复讨论
BR
BrunoArcher0365
I'm reconciling our batch of 237 for sample verification with Universal Robots UR5e in a fixture inspection station with item labels, using a small mounting plate. The dashboard looks nearly finished because its post-restart counter includes repeat inspections. Items can have failed checks followed by reviewed retries. I want the accepted-item count to be accurate without discarding that attempt history.

13 条回复

NA
NadiaBrooks0813

Pick a traceable item and compare all of its inspection attempts with its current accepted disposition. Does your counter count the attempts rather than the item?

6
BR
BrunoArcher0365

Yes. Our saved history has multiple successful attempts against one item identity, and each adds to the counter. That's where the extra progress comes from.

16
NA
NadiaBrooks0813

Rebuild an offline total from item dispositions, keeping attempts underneath. Counting each accepted identity once should give you the right batch total.

21
HE
HenryCarter0960

Your counting rule needs the current disposition. Deduplicating all identities with any successful attempt would still include an item whose disposition was subsequently changed to rejected.

2
NA
NadiaBrooks0813

Right. I should've said current authorized disposition. Keep the full history, but count an item only if its current disposition makes it accepted for this batch.

6
BR
BrunoArcher0365

So a failed check followed by reviewed acceptance stays one item, with both attempts visible? That's the view I was trying to get.

14
NA
NadiaBrooks0813

Yes. Attempts explain its history; current disposition determines whether that item contributes to accepted quantity.

22
AN
AnnaCarter1025

@NadiaBrooks0813 My own report showed attempt count separately from accepted-item count, making the reinspection history visible enough to explain why those totals differed.

13
AI
AishaAli0257

Does a retry get a new item ID then? Or just a new attempt ID?

9
NA
NadiaBrooks0813

Same physical item, same item identity. The distinct inspection gets its own attempt identity, linked back to that item.

15
BR
BrunoArcher0365

@NadiaBrooks0813 Our newer records have both IDs. Some older results don't have an item link, so I can't put them into that total confidently.

18
BR
BrunoArcher0365

I've settled the counting rule: current accepted item dispositions, with attempts retained as history. I'll close the report fix when the reconciled items and offline restart give the same explainable total.

12
NA
NadiaBrooks0813

@BrunoArcher0365 That rule preserves the inspection history and gives the total a clear basis, with reconciliation still required for closure.

21

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。