The wrong housing insert fits rather nicely
LuisBarnes0608 · 2025年8月8日 01:39 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
12 条回复
Give each insert a visible identity first. Does the housing hide that identity when it is loaded?
15分Yes. The stamped number is underneath. You can identify the insert perfectly after taking the whole thing apart. Our recipe names are just small and large.
12分Move the identification into view and use matching names on the recipe list. That helps people check, but the reversible mounting still needs attention.
23分Toolroom suggested moving one locating pin off centre. Both insert families would keep the same new mounting pattern. That should sort the backwards fit, at least.
18分And which bit stops me choosing the wrong family?
21分Try both wrong combinations on the drawing before anyone drills anything, because a new pin can still leave you with two equally convincing wrong choices.
10分Robin's question needs its own answer. A direction key will not identify the family. Can your changeover check compare the actual insert with the selected recipe?
12分We put a number beside the handle. Underneath was useless with gloves and a full bench.
17分Our proposed check only sees an insert present. I've asked controls about reading its identity. Fiona, thanks for the handle idea. There is room there.
15分Does lifting it out cancel the previous check?
16分It will in the revised sequence. Toolroom has drawn the direction key and readable number. Automatic identity checking is still a proposal, so we're not releasing the changeover yet.
20分Use one naming scheme in stores too. The spare insert is where a beginner may first meet these names, long before the recipe screen.
9分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .