Our planned planning camera inspection of reflective parts in a robot-presented camera station has Fairino FR10 presenting a brushed stainless trim plate to a fixed camera.
The example images contain bright streaks that shift with small presentation differences, yet those streaks are being labelled as scratches.
Before commissioning, I'd like to establish reliable references and image conditions for threshold tuning.
Fairino FR10: Bright streaks move when we present the part differently
MiaBarnes0557 · 2026年7月17日 04:56 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
6 条回复
@MiaBarnes0557 Were those scratches confirmed on the physical samples using your agreed appearance method? Start by linking each image to a sample and its inspection result.
25分Some labels came from the pictures alone. We still have the samples, but those labels aren't tied to physical inspection results. That's irritatingly circular.
14分Keep the image-only labels uncertain pending physical inspection. A controlled comparison of lighting and presentation can then investigate whether the moving streaks indicate reflection effects.
19分@YasminBennett0702 That clue needs a limit: presentation can also change how a real scratch appears. Movement in the image isn't enough to reclassify the sample as acceptable.
0分@ChloeBarnes0570 You're right to qualify that. The streak behaviour motivates an imaging investigation; it doesn't replace physical classification under the agreed inspection procedure.
23分@YasminBennett0702 Should uncertain images be treated as acceptable, or kept somewhere separate while their status is established?
11分