Our FR5 inspection planning set contains one faceplate photographed at several small angles. The bright streak moves, and three reviewers labelled the images differently without examining the physical part. I do not think those labels are a sound basis for tuning detection. How would you rebuild this small reference set?
Three reviewers labelled the same faceplate three different ways
BrunoBennett0713 · 2025年3月16日 01:56 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
1 条回复
Get quality to examine the actual faceplate and locate any real damage first. Keep each image tied to that piece and its presentation. Then photograph known accepted and rejected parts under repeatable conditions. Otherwise you're teaching the system to reproduce a disagreement about reflections.
17分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .