Our FR10 sleeve leans even after the pads were checked

PriyaBarnes0568 · 2026年1月5日 16:44 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

PR
PriyaBarnes0568
The pads match the drawing this time. Our molded sleeve still tilts at pickup. The accumulated point corrections are hiding something.

18 条回复

NO
NoahBennett0716

Look at the sleeve before the fingers touch it. Matching pads are useful to establish, but they won't make a sleeve sit square in a pocket that isn't supporting it properly.

13分
PR
PriyaBarnes0568

Some sleeves rock in the pocket by hand. Others sit flat. Same marked sleeve type.

10分
SO
SofiaBaker0456

Keep one of each for comparison, with the pocket they came from.

4分
LI
LinBrooks0792

Could still be the pocket. I had a moulded part catch on a little patch of residue and spent far too long comparing parts because the ones with slightly different edges caught it more readily. Two things can cooperate to make you look daft.

5分
NA
NaomiArcher0419

Compare both sleeves in the same identified pocket. Then compare that pocket with the intended seat. Otherwise you're changing the part and the support together.

11分
NO
NoahBennett0716

Naomi's comparison would tell you more than another pickup edit. Who is examining the part variation with quality? The same type marking doesn't promise identical actual bases.

6分
PR
PriyaBarnes0568

Quality and tooling have both samples. One has a raised moulding edge underneath. It touches the pocket floor.

15分
SO
SofiaBaker0456

Does that edge fall inside the sleeve's accepted condition, or is it a part defect?

19分
LI
LinBrooks0792

Don't let my residue story become the diagnosis, by the way. You've found a physical edge on the part now; I'd want quality's answer before anybody attacks the pocket with a file.

6分
PR
PriyaBarnes0568

Quality says the edge is permitted. The drawing locates on the annular face beside it, not that edge.

13分
NA
NaomiArcher0419

Then ask tooling whether the pocket leaves that edge clear. A permitted part still needs the intended contacts.

18分
NO
NoahBennett0716

And keep the old point changes available for whoever restores the job after the mechanical work. Don't erase the trail and make them discover those offsets all over again.

2分
PR
PriyaBarnes0568

Pocket drawing has clearance there. Fitted insert does not. Tooling identified an older insert in the tray.

3分
LI
LinBrooks0792

There it is. Was the tray label identifying the insert or just the carrier? Ours said the right thing in very legible letters on the wrong bit of tooling.

6分
PR
PriyaBarnes0568

Carrier only. Correct insert fitted by maintenance; both retained sleeves now seat on the intended face. Job verification follows.

4分
NA
NaomiArcher0419

Include the permitted edge variation in that verification, plus release. The easy sleeve shouldn't do all the demonstrating.

11分
PR
PriyaBarnes0568

Verification complete with quality's accepted sleeve range, pickup and release included. Reviewed job now matches the corrected tooling. Thank you, Naomi, for pinning down the pocket comparison.

14分
LI
LinBrooks0792

Good result. I bet the old insert looked reassuringly familiar every time it went back in.

11分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .