Our application misses brief PLC requests, and the ordinary job-interface notes do not name signal owners or clearing conditions; what should I ask the authors to explain before changing the timing (the safety functions are separate)?
What should clear the request in our UR5e coupon inspection interface?
NadiaChen1161 · 2026年6月11日 05:54 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
8 条回复
Does the PLC wait for application acceptance before clearing its request?
15分No, it clears on a timer; the application can acknowledge later, but the PLC does not wait for that acknowledgement.
8分Ask them to walk one request through the two programs and state who changes each signal. Include a slow response and a stopped application, since extending the pulse alone leaves those cases unclear.
14分回复 AmyAli0206
I have requested that sequence and asked the integration lead to own the shared description rather than keeping separate assumptions in two documents.
5分Do you have an observed request and application-read trace for a missed case? That would help the authors discuss the timing actually present instead of only their intended sequence.
16分Only the PLC trace so far; application-read timing is being requested, so I cannot yet demonstrate exactly which read missed the request.
8分Thanks. Has the shared clearing sequence been agreed yet?
22分Normal ownership is drafted, but clearing after timeout and restart remains unagreed; I am keeping the interface review open.
12分