I am sorting old gusseted mounting-bracket records for our proposed FR5 fixture work. Aligned while held, outside the drawing after release, then an unexplained correction routine. The stage labels are sketchy. How would you establish whether the supposed final check really describes an unrestrained bracket? Records review only.
Which bracket check was actually made after release?
JamieChen1165 · 2026年8月24日 14:03 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
18 条回复
Who signed the final check, and can they identify its support arrangement?
25分Ask for the measured feature too. Aligned can mean several different checks.
9分And do not let a fixture-loading tick become a dimensional pass. Our setters use ticks for jobs that still need inspection
18分回复 LiamChen1186
Final inspector is still here. I have the drawing revision and assembly identity, but the inspection sheet just says bench check. I have asked about the supports and the actual feature.
5分Bench check sounds reassuring until you ask what was on the bench. I would keep the inspector's explanation alongside the original sheet, especially if the proposal has already treated that entry as an unrestrained result.
21分Has the proposal already done that?
12分回复 LiamChen1186
Yes. It says the brackets pass final inspection after removal. Inspector remembers using the checking fixture, which supports the bracket differently from the released measurement setup. Looking for its instruction now.
7分Different support does not automatically invalidate it. Compare each method with the drawing requirement.
6分Hassan is right. A checking fixture may be correct. We need its locating and holding conditions, not a vote against fixtures
7分Agreed. I meant the summary is ahead of the evidence, not that the inspector used an invalid method. Thank you for making that distinction explicit.
19分Found the instruction. The final fixture clamps the flange for a different feature check. Quality confirms that pass cannot replace the released flange requirement. So the two entries were answering different questions.
2分Then where is acceptance of the released flange recorded?
1分回复 LiamChen1186
Not in this packet. Quality has asked the archive owner to trace it. I have removed the claim that the final tick closes the released failure from my review draft.
12分Does the correction instruction name that flange, or another feature? That may explain the missing route
22分The correction note names the flange, but gives no method or subsequent reading. I cannot connect it to an accepted released condition yet. That is the missing evidence, rather than a general claim that the fixture is bad.
4分Keep the failed released reading. It remains useful even while the later route is incomplete.
13分Proposal owner has replaced the summary. The clamped feature pass remains in its own column; flange acceptance after correction is now unverified. Archive enquiry is still open.
3分Who is carrying that enquiry into the new fixture review?
14分