简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Which bracket check was actually made after release?

JamieChen1165 · 2026年8月24日 14:03 UTC

回复讨论
JA
JamieChen1165
I am sorting old gusseted mounting-bracket records for our proposed FR5 fixture work. Aligned while held, outside the drawing after release, then an unexplained correction routine. The stage labels are sketchy. How would you establish whether the supposed final check really describes an unrestrained bracket? Records review only.

18 条回复

LI
LiamChen1186

Who signed the final check, and can they identify its support arrangement?

25
HA
HassanAli0182

Ask for the measured feature too. Aligned can mean several different checks.

9
CA
CalebBaker0493

And do not let a fixture-loading tick become a dimensional pass. Our setters use ticks for jobs that still need inspection

18
JA
JamieChen1165

Final inspector is still here. I have the drawing revision and assembly identity, but the inspection sheet just says bench check. I have asked about the supports and the actual feature.

5
AI
AishaBaker0518

Bench check sounds reassuring until you ask what was on the bench. I would keep the inspector's explanation alongside the original sheet, especially if the proposal has already treated that entry as an unrestrained result.

21
LI
LiamChen1186

Has the proposal already done that?

12
JA
JamieChen1165

Yes. It says the brackets pass final inspection after removal. Inspector remembers using the checking fixture, which supports the bracket differently from the released measurement setup. Looking for its instruction now.

7
HA
HassanAli0182

Different support does not automatically invalidate it. Compare each method with the drawing requirement.

6
CA
CalebBaker0493

Hassan is right. A checking fixture may be correct. We need its locating and holding conditions, not a vote against fixtures

7
AI
AishaBaker0518

Agreed. I meant the summary is ahead of the evidence, not that the inspector used an invalid method. Thank you for making that distinction explicit.

19
JA
JamieChen1165

Found the instruction. The final fixture clamps the flange for a different feature check. Quality confirms that pass cannot replace the released flange requirement. So the two entries were answering different questions.

2
LI
LiamChen1186

Then where is acceptance of the released flange recorded?

1
JA
JamieChen1165

Not in this packet. Quality has asked the archive owner to trace it. I have removed the claim that the final tick closes the released failure from my review draft.

12
CA
CalebBaker0493

Does the correction instruction name that flange, or another feature? That may explain the missing route

22
JA
JamieChen1165

The correction note names the flange, but gives no method or subsequent reading. I cannot connect it to an accepted released condition yet. That is the missing evidence, rather than a general claim that the fixture is bad.

4
HA
HassanAli0182

Keep the failed released reading. It remains useful even while the later route is incomplete.

13
JA
JamieChen1165

Proposal owner has replaced the summary. The clamped feature pass remains in its own column; flange acceptance after correction is now unverified. Archive enquiry is still open.

3
LI
LiamChen1186

Who is carrying that enquiry into the new fixture review?

14

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。