What does 'inspected' mean on this refurbished Universal Robots UR5e?

JonasAli0198 · 2026年8月6日 03:29 UTC

回复讨论

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

JO
JonasAli0198
A refurbished Universal Robots UR5e looks tempting for our parts tray unloading setup with a small aluminum block in a supervised handling workshop. The price is attractive and the listing says 'inspected', but i haven't seen the inspection scope. What should i ask for before paying to collect it?

18 条回复

GA
GabrielBrown0888

It would help to know whether you've a condition assessment or only a list of replaced items. What documentation has the seller supplied beyond the listing?

18分
JO
JonasAli0198

@GabrielBrown0888 A replacement list. Nothing about the assemblies they left alone. Better than nothing, but 'inspected' is doing a lot of work here.

-1分
GA
GabrielBrown0888

Request the unit-specific inspection scope and a complete inventory of what's included. You can then make a qualified condition assessment and a demonstration relevant to your application conditions of purchase.

8分
LI
LinBell0618

@GabrielBrown0888 Sorry, basic question: doesn't refurbished mean they checked the whole thing? I'm not sure what the label promises.

19分
GA
GabrielBrown0888

@LinBell0618 You need the underlying scope to know what the description means here. Request the checks performed, their results and anything excluded for this particular unit.

21分
PA
PavelBrooks0788

@GabrielBrown0888 When I bought a used arm for my setup, an itemised inventory revealed that a cable we needed wasn't included. Identifying it made the extra cost straightforward to establish

8分
JO
JonasAli0198

Did you ask for photos of every item? Their bundle description is mostly 'complete system', which isn't helping me much.

5分
PA
PavelBrooks0788

Photos helped with mine, alongside an itemised list. Have them identify the controller, pendant, cables and included software access rather than relying on the group photo

15分
GA
GabrielBrown0888

A successful demonstration of your handling task should address the main condition uncertainty left after the paperwork review.

13分
NO
NoraBennett0757

A demonstration doesn't settle the gap in the replacement list. Successfully handling something isn't a condition assessment of the assemblies that weren't replaced

11分
GA
GabrielBrown0888

You're right to challenge that. I should have described the demonstration as evidence about the application, with the independent condition questions still requiring qualified assessment.

13分
JO
JonasAli0198

@GabrielBrown0888 i visited and saw normal movement and a successful transfer. We didn't see a backup restored, though. i'm keeping that blank on my checklist.

13分
LI
LinBell0618

@JonasAli0198 What distinguishes having a backup from demonstrating recovery? I'm wondering whether simply checking that the file opens is enough.

21分
GA
GabrielBrown0888

@LinBell0618 The useful question is whether the system can recover its required configuration through the appropriate procedure. Ask the seller and assessor to define a controlled demonstration and identify the access it requires.

16分
PA
PavelBrooks0788

For my setup, sorting access permissions was a separate handover item. A folder of files didn't explain who could actually use the recovery tools

17分
JO
JonasAli0198

Would you include support contact details in that handover? i don't want 'ask the previous owner' to be our maintenance plan.

10分
GA
GabrielBrown0888

Yes. Ask who supports this configuration, what access transfers, and what service documentation comes with it. Get the scope stated rather than assuming support follows the hardware.

15分
NO
NoraBennett0757

And don't treat a list of replaced items as a list of every possible fault. It says what they changed, not what they ruled out

5分

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 和 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。