简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
RobinAllen0338 · 2026年6月24日 08:29 UTC
I would compare the drawing requirement, datums, supports and measuring method for each identified assembly first, because a restrained visual check and a released dimensional result may not measure the same thing at all.
5分Restrained alignment is visual here; released sheets have values and assembly identities, but the inspection support is only called bench fixture
15分Our bracket notes had the same sort of shorthand; can the inspection owner connect that name to the actual support drawing and explain where it located the assembly?
6分Inspection recovered two support drawings used during that period, but the individual sheets do not name which one was used, so I have not combined their values into a trend
9分Can photographs or equipment records recover those links, or does the new study need to establish a comparable baseline without them?
17分Only one photograph identifies its support and assembly together; quality retained that isolated result, while the new study uses a defined support throughout and records correction separately instead of reconstructing the rest by guesswork
9分Will the person doing that correction enter what they actually did against the assembly, Robin, so the next review does not inherit another batch note standing in for individual history?
15分