简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
CarlaBrown0923 · 2026年7月1日 02:02 UTC
Which contact changes between the bench samples, and are those samples within the drawing requirements?
6分Who is responsible for the nest's datum scheme? A clamp supplier won't necessarily own the location you end up forcing.
4分Toby, the upright face touches at different places while the bottom remains on its pads. Sample inspection isn't complete. Clara, our tool designer owns the location scheme; the stronger clamp was only a suggestion from purchasing.
25分I'd leave purchasing out of the diagnosis; more force is an expensive way to hide which contact won.
7分And retain the unforced observations alongside inspection, Carla, rather than testing only the sample that sits nicely.
13分Inspection has now checked the samples. All meet the relevant drawing limits, including the face variation. Our designer says the extra upper contact assumes a squareness the drawing doesn't require. He's looking at a relieved arrangement while keeping the intended location defined.
-2分Does the proposed relief leave a defined constraint for each required movement, rather than simply letting the awkward sample settle somewhere?
22分Dinesh's question belongs on the design release too. Otherwise the handover becomes a photograph of the bracket everyone liked that afternoon.
10分Could the same checked samples be reseated independently after the revision, with their identities retained?
7分Dinesh and Clara, the revised drawing now identifies the remaining locating contacts and the released requirement they're meant to establish. Toby, we're keeping those same samples for repeated reseating. Tooling hasn't finished the revised nest yet.
9分Then the stronger clamp can stay unordered; you've found a drawing assumption, not demonstrated a finished fixture.
18分