简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

The faceplate streak moves but its scratch label stays put

CallumBaker0447 · 2026年6月18日 14:58 UTC

回复讨论
CA
CallumBaker0447
Our UR5e camera proposal has a bright faceplate streak in different places across the examples. The scratch label follows it without anyone showing the physical defect. I'd like to settle the reference cheaply before we buy our way into tuning around it. Who should compare what?

4 条回复

AL
AlexAdams0124

Can whoever owns cosmetic acceptance examine the retained faceplates against the actual requirement?

17
CA
CallumBaker0447

Yes, quality owns that decision. We have the faceplates, though the image folder doesn't identify which is which. I can arrange fresh identified captures; I can't reconstruct those identities reliably from the thumbnails.

8
AL
AlexAdams0124

Keep the old folder separate, then; fresh labels should not pretend to repair its missing identities.

22
NO
NoraAllen0322

And let quality mark the actual region they examined, because an accepted faceplate can still have a visible harmless feature and a rejected one can still contain glare; the image needs more than a whole-part verdict.

9

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。