I checked our delivered UR5e package against the fixture drawing the seller confirmed, and the tool bracket arrangement plus label suffix differ; the seller says equivalent without a dimensioned comparison, so our tooling remains unfitted while I ask what exactly has changed.
How is this UR5e interface equivalent to the drawing we approved?
ThomasBrown0886 · 2025年7月30日 09:22 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
9 条回复
Send the agreed drawing revision and delivered identifiers together, then ask for a marked comparison of the interface dimensions and any effect on your tool position
9分They confirmed drawing C before purchase; the delivered bracket is marked E, and its shoulder sits farther forward in the external comparison, though I have not treated a photograph as a dimensional measurement.
3分Good, ask for the E drawing against C; even a matching bolt pattern would leave the shoulder position unanswered
3分The seller has supplied E, but no comparison; I've passed both drawings to our tooling designer and asked the seller why E was substituted.
17分Get the delivered identifiers into the equipment folder once this is settled, because my tidy tray notes became confusing the minute a physically different spare turned up under the same description.
12分I would ask them to price supplying C as well. You might decide E is usable, but all the review time for their substitution should not become your default project plan.
19分Thomas, has the designer established whether the forward shoulder moves your grip position or only changes the bracket outline?
9分David's alternative is worth having; an equivalence discussion can otherwise keep going simply because nobody has asked how hard it would be to deliver what was agreed.
6分Did either answer come back, Thomas? Interested in whether your designer can use E or you're still waiting for the seller to offer C.
20分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .