简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
ChloeAdams0135 · 2025年11月12日 09:52 UTC
Keep it as an observation, not a repeatability result. Are the original blanks retained?
15分Retained as a mixed handful, not linked to readings. I can't reconstruct the order from memory.
14分Then don't. Label the limitation on the sheet and have inspection define a fresh identified comparison. Length, the end against the stop, and the intended seating contacts need attention; exposed length alone mixes those questions together.
4分Agreed. A tidy guessed order would make the sheet worse.
13分I've kept the old sheet with that warning. Inspector is identifying the retained blanks and asking the machinist how each was intended to contact the stop. Automatic loading remains outside this check.
7分What measuring reference did the old sheet use? Even if the individual readings cannot be paired, that description may help explain what was observed.
4分Chuck face to exposed end, confirmed by the person who measured it. Thanks Leah, I've added that description without inventing the missing sample links.
7分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .