简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
RobinCarter1034 · 2026年7月30日 09:45 UTC
Describe the two conditions independently, with one writer and explicit clearing rules for each signal. Do not choose one meaning and silently discard the other.
3分Who will own the agreed version after the suppliers finish?
13分Our controls lead can own it. I was trying to make one glossary entry work; now I see the sequence needs both facts.
19分Show a request acknowledged while the loading area is still unavailable. That example needs no ambiguous ready.
10分And ask the engineers what evidence establishes availability; an explanatory label cannot establish the physical condition or replace the cell's safety assessment.
15分Agreed. Separate the ordinary handshake from safety functions in the document, and have the responsible teams approve both the meaning and the evidence behind each ordinary condition.
15分I have drafted the waiting example with both suppliers' current interpretations shown. Haven't turned either one into an approved definition yet.
5分Will the next shift know whom to contact if those states disagree?
11分The wait message should identify what is missing, not invite someone to keep pressing start.
11分Controls is collecting timeout and restart cases for the joint review. I'll include the escalation role in the operator notes once the engineers settle those cases.
4分Keep communication loss in that review too. A retained indication needs defined treatment; its presence after reconnection is not automatically evidence of a new acknowledgement.
5分