Our accepted and rejected faceplates are identified, and quality has marked the actual rejected feature on the retained part. The FR10 presentation trial still gives us wildly different bright bands. People are calling every strong band another scratch.
Looking through the capture notes, exposure is automatic and nobody recorded the support position. I don't want the vision person tuning around a collection of unrelated pictures. Which small comparison should we rebuild first?
I cannot compare faceplate streaks when the camera keeps changing exposure
DavidArcher0432 · 2026年3月28日 14:02 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
11 条回复
Repeat the same identified faceplate with the vision person recording the imaging settings and presentation. Can the support reproduce its position, or does it move between those captures as well?
21分Support position is repeatable once located. The draft comparison mixed located captures with handheld ones, and the filenames didn't distinguish them. Originals are still there.
15分Separate those capture methods before ordering another camera. Which images were actually being used to support the proposed threshold?
25分One handheld accepted example and one located rejected example. So the threshold comparison had changed the presentation method as well as the part. I've taken that comparison out of the proposal.
12分Does the located view expose the rejected feature across the full required area?
24分Good that the originals survived; have the person rebuilding the pair use the capture notes, not just whichever filenames say accepted and rejected.
15分David, retain the awkward accepted surface in the new comparison. Controlling the capture shouldn't become permission to choose only an easy accepted plate.
8分回复 RaviChan1085
Ravi, the required edge is exposed in the located view. Imran, the same accepted plate stays in. Vision has repeated both under one recorded setup; its strong band remains, but the rejected feature is weak in that lighting.
13分Then what alternative lighting comparison is proposed? The corrected capture method has exposed a limitation worth addressing before the purchase decision.
22分They want to compare another lighting position with both plates and the same located presentation. I've added that outstanding comparison to the proposal. No new camera order and no threshold chosen.
17分Who has the updated proposal now? I'd hate the old dramatic pair to keep selling the idea after you've withdrawn it.
23分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .