our cover scratch examples disagree with each other

CalebBrown0928 · 2025年10月4日 02:28 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

CA
CalebBrown0928
One polished cover is labelled clean in the training folder and scratched in the FR10 proposal. Different presentation, bright stripe moved. I need to settle the sample before teaching either label.

5 条回复

CH
ChloeBrooks0831

Has anyone inspected the physical cover against the acceptance requirement?

8分
CA
CalebBrown0928

Quality found a small rejected mark near the fixing hole. The moving stripe is elsewhere. Our image labels didn't identify either feature, which made the comparison rather unhelpful.

10分
CH
ChloeBrooks0831

Can your chosen presentation show that actual rejected mark consistently?

9分
CA
CalebBrown0928

Not established yet. I've replaced the guessed training label with the quality decision and marked the actual feature. The vision comparison still needs repeated seating under controlled lighting.

5分
CH
ChloeBrooks0831

Keep an unmarked image too. The annotation may hide a feature you need to compare.

20分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .