Identity confirmed. Quality accepted that bezel and supplied an identified reject with a fine edge scratch; the old band label is withdrawn from the shared set.

Can the proposed holder show the reject's edge region in the camera view, Naomi?

Keep the accepted bright-band example beside it. The awkward good finish still belongs in the comparison.

NoraArcher, the holder covers part of the scratched edge, so the supplier is reviewing its support arrangement before the lighting comparison continues.

Don't just remove the support to uncover the scratch. Tooling needs to preserve the intended location and hold while opening the view. Otherwise the optical improvement comes with a newly wandering bezel.

Has tooling identified which support must change, Naomi?

The rear rail obscures the region. Designer has proposed a relieved rail that keeps the locating pads; its bench comparison with our accepted range is next.

Use the actual loading person in that comparison. A careful one-off presentation can hide the changed holder's awkward bits.

Tooling and loader repeated the accepted range with the prototype rail; seating stayed repeatable and the edge is visible. Camera specialist can now see the real scratch, though contrast still varies at the presentation extremes.

Has the quote picked up the revised rail and remaining imaging work?

And keep the full prototype views with the reference images, Naomi. The next person needs to know which holder produced them rather than assume the original rail suddenly became transparent.