简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

What should a changeover prove before automated use?

SarahAli0241 · 2026年7月16日 12:52 UTC

回复讨论
SA
SarahAli0241
Our planned loading rigid components into interchangeable nests with Universal Robots UR5e in a mixed-product assembly workshop uses interchangeable nest inserts. The insert for a compact aluminium housing looks almost like another family insert and appears able to fit backwards. We're reviewing this before automated use. I need a check that connects the installed tooling to the recipe, not just a nicer label.

3 条回复

PR
PriyaAli0220

Can the reversed insert reach the intended seat, according to the drawings? Check that first, alongside which insert revision the recipe expects

14
SA
SarahAli0241

The mounting features are symmetric, but the part datum isn't. The setup sheet names the insert family without a revision. Two gaps already.

6
PR
PriyaAli0220

Ask the fixture designer to review asymmetric keying using those drawings. A configuration table should also link the insert's identity and revision to the applicable part and recipe

22

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。