One stainless trim plate has two scratch labels in our FR5 image folder. The bright streak moves between captures. The physical plate does not have two matching marks. I want those labels checked before they become training examples.
Our trim plate changes verdict when the bright streak moves
LeoBaker0449 · 2026年3月1日 16:02 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
10 条回复
回复 LeoBaker0449
Keep the plate tied to both captures. Who assigned the labels, and were they looking at the actual plate or only the images?
17分Two people labelled separate image folders. Neither had the plate. Quality has now examined it and found no corresponding scratch at either labelled position.
8分回复 LeoBaker0449
Can you withdraw both labels without deleting the images? I would keep them as examples of the confusion, provided their corrected status is obvious.
22分回复 LeoBaker0449
And get an actual marked plate beside it. We improved seating on a cover job and still lost the real scratch under the lamp. A clean image wasn't enough.
4分Isaac's point is useful. Leo, do you have an agreed reject available for the imaging comparison?
11分Yes. A separate identified plate with an accepted rejection decision. We have kept its physical mark location with its captures. The two false labels on the first plate are withdrawn.
5分回复 LeoBaker0449
Who updates the copies already sent to the programmer? I do not know your folder arrangement, but correcting the source alone may leave them using the old version.
10分I sent the corrected index and asked them to discard the old labelled set. They confirmed the active set now uses the corrected status. Thank you, Jack; there was a local copy I had forgotten.
14分回复 LeoBaker0449
How does the actual reject look in the proposed presentation?
10分Its mark is clear in one capture and weak in another. The labelling error is closed. Imaging still needs work before we tune acceptance.
9分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .