简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
BenAdams0109 · 2025年8月31日 22:33 UTC
Restore the correction and inspection as unresolved work in the estimate until a current-part trial establishes which operations remain necessary.
15分Estimator has put them back as open lines. Fabrication says the press was used on some batches, not all. No batch-by-batch count yet.
20分Ask whether the old route cards identify those batches; an average based on memory would give the spreadsheet another attractive number with weak foundations.
11分Do the final figures all use the same drawing revision? Could be another difference hidden in that spreadsheet.
14分Julia, no. Two revisions are mixed. I've separated them and asked quality which measurements changed between the drawings.
25分Route cards identify press use for part of the period. Earlier cards are missing. We can describe that subset, not claim an overall correction rate.
8分Keep the missing period visible alongside any quoted rate, and have the trial cover the current component and fixture proposal rather than reproducing whichever old batch is easiest to document.
7分Trial scope is with welding and quality now. Current revision only, with individual pieces followed through released measurement and any correction. No results yet. At least the estimate no longer pretends the press was decorative.
10分Who keeps the sample IDs attached when the brackets move to the press? Worth settling before the trial starts.
20分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .