I'm checking the FR10 bracket estimate. The old route has a press operation between welding and accepted dimensions. The new spreadsheet removed it and kept the old acceptance figures. Nobody can explain that leap, but everybody likes the resulting cycle time.
our bracket spreadsheet quietly deleted the press operation
BenAdams0109 · 2025年8月31日 22:33 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
9 条回复
回复 BenAdams0109
Restore the correction and inspection as unresolved work in the estimate until a current-part trial establishes which operations remain necessary.
15分Estimator has put them back as open lines. Fabrication says the press was used on some batches, not all. No batch-by-batch count yet.
20分回复 BenAdams0109
Ask whether the old route cards identify those batches; an average based on memory would give the spreadsheet another attractive number with weak foundations.
11分回复 BenAdams0109
Do the final figures all use the same drawing revision? Could be another difference hidden in that spreadsheet.
14分Julia, no. Two revisions are mixed. I've separated them and asked quality which measurements changed between the drawings.
25分Route cards identify press use for part of the period. Earlier cards are missing. We can describe that subset, not claim an overall correction rate.
8分回复 BenAdams0109
Keep the missing period visible alongside any quoted rate, and have the trial cover the current component and fixture proposal rather than reproducing whichever old batch is easiest to document.
7分Trial scope is with welding and quality now. Current revision only, with individual pieces followed through released measurement and any correction. No results yet. At least the estimate no longer pretends the press was decorative.
10分回复 BenAdams0109
Who keeps the sample IDs attached when the brackets move to the press? Worth settling before the trial starts.
20分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .