简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Are we teaching our camera to reject reflections?

RaviBennett0737 · 2026年7月9日 14:00 UTC

回复讨论
RA
RaviBennett0737
We're planning planning camera inspection of reflective parts, with Universal Robots UR5e presenting a polished metal cover to a fixed camera in a cosmetic components workshop. Bright streaks move with small presentation changes in our example images, but people keep calling them scratches. We haven't commissioned the cell. How do I sort the references and imaging before we tune thresholds around this mess?

5 条回复

JU
JuliaAbbott0065

@RaviBennett0737 Were those scratches confirmed on the physical samples using your agreed appearance method? Start by linking each image to a sample and its inspection result.

19
RA
RaviBennett0737

I've found that some labels were assigned from the images themselves. The samples are still available, but those labels have no corresponding physical inspection results, making the reference circular

22
JU
JuliaAbbott0065

@RaviBennett0737 Keep the image-only labels uncertain pending physical inspection. A controlled comparison of lighting and presentation can then investigate whether the moving streaks indicate reflection effects.

6
RA
RaviBennett0737

The reference problem is clearer, but I still can't judge inspection performance from our example images. The physical labels and image comparisons need more work

21
JU
JuliaAbbott0065

That follows from the reference gap. Explaining it more clearly helps, but the images still can't carry a performance claim.

9

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。