Our full-stack picture looks tidy, but the turned cases bridge finger gaps and dispatch often stops before completing that layer. I need packaging support and tool withdrawal reviewed for the actual partial orders too, before the operator diagram tells somebody to build an arrangement nobody has accepted.
Who checks the support beneath our FR10 partial layer?
SofiaBell0630 · 2025年12月18日 07:08 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
4 条回复
Give packaging and tooling the same packed-case sections and required partial-order examples, with the actual pallet and finger movement included; the complete-stack illustration cannot answer those missing cases
20分Dispatch has listed the partial builds it needs. Packaging only reviewed the full stack so far, while tooling's withdrawal sketch leaves the supporting layer out. Both reviews are still incomplete.
20分Who owns combining those comments, Sofia? Dispatch can tell you the work it needs to do, but it shouldn't be left choosing between two drawings whose authors have each assumed the other person's clearance.
23分Our integrator owns the combined revision. I've asked it to return the partial examples with the full stack, not leave them for the trainer to improvise afterwards.
13分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .