Is alternating the layers actually right for our cartons?

AmyBrooks0815 · 2026年8月13日 15:42 UTC

回复讨论

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

AM
AmyBrooks0815
Our plan for planning alternating carton layers on a pallet with Fairino FR10 in a carton palletising project has a very neat alternating layer drawing. But a corrugated case of components has a preferred support direction, and some rotated cartons sit over gaps. I want packaging support and tool access reviewed together before I accept the pattern. Where should I start?

5 条回复

ME
MeiCarter1038

Start by showing the carton edges that carry load and the pallet deck support on the layer drawings. Is the complete gripper outline available to overlay as well?

7分
AM
AmyBrooks0815

We've only got top-view rectangles and a tool centre mark. The carton note specifies support direction, but the layer drawing doesn't show it

6分
ME
MeiCarter1038

Give packaging and the integrator a drawing combining those details. A repeated unrotated layer is worth assessing alongside the alternating one because it may better suit the specified support direction.

10分
AM
AmyBrooks0815

I'm holding the pattern decision. A neat footprint doesn't establish the packaging support and tool access our cell needs

12分
ME
MeiCarter1038

Your reason for holding the pattern is clear: its arrangement hasn't established the support and access required by the cell.

9分

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 和 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。