Our inspection report adds a coupon when it sees the PLC completion state high after reconnect. The state belongs to the previous attempt. I have retained the trace and left the coupon under review. What should identify a result across reconnect without clearing the evidence or resending the job?
Our FR10 report counts the retained PLC high again
AaronAli0175 · 2026年2月17日 23:22 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
2 条回复
回复 AaronAli0175
Give the job attempt an identity that survives that interruption, with an agreed meaning for receipt and completion. The receiving application can then recognise a result it already processed. For the existing coupon, can your retained evidence connect that high state to one identified attempt?
5分Only to the job name, which we reuse. The old trace has no attempt identity shared with the report. I can demonstrate the duplicate counter increment in a replay, but I cannot assign the original completion confidently. That coupon stays under review while we change the interface.
4分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .