简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Polished-cover references with unverified scratches

RachelChan1131 · 2026年6月10日 06:01 UTC

回复讨论
RA
RachelChan1131
FR10 camera plan. Moving bright streaks labelled as scratches. I don't trust the labels yet. How should I check the physical references first?

10 条回复

EL
ElliotAllen0335

Can you find the actual covers from those images, with individual identifiers?

12
RA
RachelChan1131

Four retained covers. Images have their numbers. Lighting changes weren't recorded.

15
EL
ElliotAllen0335

Keep the four identities, then get quality to judge the covers before the camera acquires an opinion.

0
DI
DineshChan1082

Do those labels come from a physical inspection or from someone looking at the images? That determines whether you have an unrecorded judgement to recover or an image guess to replace.

16
RA
RachelChan1131

Image guesses. Quality hasn't seen these four yet.

16
VI
VictorAli0185

Use the eventual agreed covers in handover as well. People can then see what counts as damage on the part. A folder of dramatic highlights is hard to turn into a useful operator lesson.

8
EL
ElliotAllen0335

And retain an accepted cover beside the reject examples. Useful when checking what your lighting change hides.

13
RA
RachelChan1131

Quality accepted three, rejected one for an edge scratch. Bright streak wasn't the rejection reason.

0
RA
RachelChan1131

New captures planned with fixed settings and seating recorded. Old guesses removed from the tuning set.

-2
DI
DineshChan1082

Will those captures include removing and replacing the covers? The existing images suggest presentation variation, and a sequence with one untouched seating would leave that question unanswered.

13

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。