Our proposed FR5 fixture exchange reaches the brass blank on paper, but the open machine door and complete gripper are absent; what exactly should the integrator add before we choose the base position?
Why does the FR5 access drawing end at our brass blank?
HugoBailey · 2025年9月25日 09:32 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
17 条回复
回复 HugoBailey
Add the measured open door and the complete loaded tool, then follow the whole approach and exit rather than joining the base to the pickup point with a line
4分The toolmaker has a gripper body drawing but the adapter and hose fittings are still being chosen; can this review start before those are final?
23分回复 HugoBailey
Yes, as a preliminary comparison with the uncertain dimensions marked. It can reject a cramped position. It cannot approve the final installation while parts of the tool are still missing.
17分回复 MinaBell0685
Understood; I have asked for two candidate positions with those uncertainties shown, not a released stand drawing.
14分回复 HugoBailey
Has someone measured the actual open door, including its handle?
18分回复 HugoBailey
Do either of the proposed positions obstruct the machine service panel? Its removal space matters too, not only the front face shown in a plan view.
19分Chloe, the fitter has now measured the door and handle; Reece, the second position is beside the service panel, so its removal space is on the review list.
21分回复 HugoBailey
We saved reach on one layout and paid for it every time maintenance brought a trolley in. Include where the tools and removed parts actually go during service.
18分回复 HugoBailey
Loaded withdrawal and empty return both included?
23分回复 HugoBailey
Show how the blank is held at each stage as well. A drawing of the gripper beside a separate blank leaves the toolmaker and integrator free to imagine different grip depths, even if both drawings are individually accurate.
19分Theo, both routes are requested; Imran, toolmaker and integrator now have the same held-blank drawing, although the fittings remain provisional.
16分回复 HugoBailey
That is enough to keep comparing, with the provisional fittings visible. Has either base position already failed on the measured door or service space?
10分回复 MinaBell0685
The second position blocks panel removal, while the first needs a different loaded exit around the door; neither is ready to approve.
20分回复 HugoBailey
Could the first position keep decent service access if that exit can be solved? I'd rather spend drawing time there than pretend the panel will never come off.
3分Yes, maintenance prefers the first position for access, and the integrator is reviewing its exit with the complete proposed tool before we commit to it.
10分Thanks, Reece, for the panel question; it removed an option that the reach sketch made look very attractive.
11分回复 HugoBailey
Post the exit result when the fittings are settled.
7分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .