简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
IsabelBell0648 · 2025年10月17日 07:23 UTC
Have quality examine that bezel before keeping either scratch label, and retain the seating views too because they may explain why the line moves without telling you whether the part is acceptable.
21分Quality accepted the physical bezel under their inspection method. I removed both defect labels from the teaching set. The line is still useful to show the students, just not as a confirmed scratch.
19分That sounds useful for teaching uncertainty, but do you also have a rejected physical sample to show what the intended inspection must find?
23分Not yet. We have photographs of rejects, but their parts are gone. I have asked quality to retain a current rejected bezel and explain the judgement with the sample in front of us.
20分Keep that request separate from the seating problem, Isabel, so waiting for a rejected sample doesn't leave the presentation differences unexplained.
24分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .