I am preparing UR5e inspection examples for our students. A bright line crosses one aluminium bezel in the first image and moves towards the rim when I reseat it. Both images have been marked scratched. I kept the bezel, but no one has checked its surface yet.
The bezel scratch moves when I reseat the same part
IsabelBell0648 · 2025年10月17日 07:23 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
5 条回复
Have quality examine that bezel before keeping either scratch label, and retain the seating views too because they may explain why the line moves without telling you whether the part is acceptable.
21分回复 NoraChen1192
Quality accepted the physical bezel under their inspection method. I removed both defect labels from the teaching set. The line is still useful to show the students, just not as a confirmed scratch.
19分That sounds useful for teaching uncertainty, but do you also have a rejected physical sample to show what the intended inspection must find?
23分回复 NoraChen1192
Not yet. We have photographs of rejects, but their parts are gone. I have asked quality to retain a current rejected bezel and explain the judgement with the sample in front of us.
20分Keep that request separate from the seating problem, Isabel, so waiting for a rejected sample doesn't leave the presentation differences unexplained.
24分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .