I can't approve this copied bracket correction

VeraBailey · 2025年5月23日 11:44 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

VE
VeraBailey
Our UR5e welding proposal inherits an old fixture with a 'correct before finish' note. The records say the bracket lines up under the clamps, then misses the drawing once released. I can't approve copying that adjustment when nobody can explain what it corrected. We've got retained parts and old inspection sheets. I'd like to get quality and tooling looking at the same evidence before this becomes a new fixture by habit

13 条回复

AM
AmyAbbott0032
回复 VeraBailey

Start with the part revisions on those retained samples. I have just seen a gusset change get lost because everyone followed the finished assembly number. Do yours actually match the proposed bracket?

22分
VE
VeraBailey

Some do. Two are an older gusset. We've split those out, thanks. The old inspection sheets aren't nearly as well labelled as the parts

16分
AM
AmyAbbott0032
回复 VeraBailey

Then don't merge the old numbers yet. Get the current samples measured from the drawing first.

15分
BR
BrunoChen1148
回复 VeraBailey

What does correct mean on the old job? If someone physically adjusted the bracket after welding, the final sheet may describe the adjusted part rather than what came out of the fixture.

21分
VE
VeraBailey

Nobody I've asked knows. The traveller has a correction tick but no before-and-after readings

22分
VE
VeraBailey

Toolroom found a separate checking plate in the old kit. We haven't established whether the loose-part height was measured on it or directly on the table.

5分
AM
AmyAbbott0032
回复 VeraBailey

Can the old inspector recognise the setup from photos? Cheaper than moving the whole jig around to recreate guesses.

11分
TH
ThomasBrown0886
回复 VeraBailey

Check the measurement references as well as the support arrangement; a height measured from the fixture base cannot be compared directly with a height measured from the part's underside without understanding the geometry.

-2分
NO
NoraAbbott0061
回复 VeraBailey

The correction tick is a gap in the history. Keep it visible when comparing final measurements; it may conceal a separate operation the new proposal has not included.

10分
AM
AmyAbbott0032

Did the inspector recognise the plate?

15分
VE
VeraBailey

Yes. Used for fit-up, not final inspection. Final height came from a different setup that quality is now documenting. That removes one false comparison from our meeting

14分
VE
VeraBailey

The unexplained correction is staying out of the new requirements. Quality owns released-part acceptance; tooling is defining location from the current drawing. Still waiting on measurements of the traceable current samples.

20分
AM
AmyAbbott0032
回复 VeraBailey

Post those when you have them. Interested whether the current bracket still has the old problem once everyone measures the same thing.

16分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .